~ Field Expedient Preparation of Black Powders ~

By Unknown
18 pgs


Intuition  ~  Creativity  ~  Adaptability
Home Page
Table of Contents
Emergencies
Family Affairs
Natural Disasters
New World Order
Outdoor Survival
Self-Reliance
Shortages
TEOTWAWKI
Terrorism & Terrorists
United States Government
War & Military
Other Stuff


Contact SSRsi
News, Ads and Chat
Support SSRsi
Reciprocal Links


SSRsi OnLine Store
Get Firefox!
SSRsi Disclaimer & Note on Text:
This text was found on the internet. The author is unknown. The veracity of the information is unknown - and therefore suspect.

SSRsi does not advocate the home preparation of any form of propellant, explosive, or other pyrotechnics. Attempting to do so without specialized training, equipment and facilities will almost certainly result in serious injury to persons and property.

Explosives, pyrotechnics  and propellants are generally regulated by law and their manufacture is usually frowned upon (if not outright prohibited) by law enforcement.

This text is presented by SSRsi for information purposes only.

Do not attempt to duplicate the processes described herein.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
	I. APPROACH
	II. DISCUSSION
	III. EXPERIMENTAL
		A. Black Powder Preparations - Initial Phase
		B. Black Powder Preparation by the Precipitation Method
		C. Application Tests
	IV. CONCLUSIONS
	APPENDIX A


I. APPROACH

	The following sequence was pursued in the black powder study.
		A. Literature survey.
		B. Evaluation of techniques for the preparation of black powder.
		C. Performance evaluation of various preparations.
		D. Preparation of a field manual outlining preparation procedure(s).

II. DISCUSSION

	The fact that the black powder has been known to exist for some 2,000 years does not necessarily imply 
its current mode of preparation is particularly simple. Although a great number of investigators have independently 
studied and prepared black powders, all procedures that have resulted in satisfactory products are somewhat
involved with respect to the incorporation steps. Simple mixing techniques of either dry or moist ingredients 
invariably result in inferior products. The purpose of the current program has been the establishment of a method, 
or methods, for the preparation of suitable black powders which may be accomplished by novice personnel using 
simple, readily obtainable implements.

	A number of basic parameters are all important in the successful blending of black powder. Initially, the 
sulfur must be intimately incorporated into the cellular structure of the carbon which is usually accomplished by ball 
milling. Subsequently, the nitrate is mixed with the fuel mixture and requires pressure milling (while moist) in order to
achieve proper intimacy. Failure to attain the proper degree of incorporation of the ingredients invariably results in 
inferior products.

	The initial phase of the program dealt with possible means by which the commercial methods could be 
converted, at least in part, to field expedient procedures. These studies resulted in poor to mediocre products, and 
inconsistent results were the rule rather than the exception. The lack of any significant degree of success is 
attributed to substitution of inferior equipment in the operation and lack of experience required throughout the 
process.

	Of necessity, a method meeting the design criteria of the current program must employ available utensils, 
and require a very limited degree of practice or instruction. This would dictate that principles of preparation be 
unaffected by a broad range of variation in the procedure, or be a procedure of ultimate simplicity. This goal was
achieved through the investigation and development of a unique precipitation procedure. Essentially, this method 
consists of preparing a hot slurry of charcoal and sulfur suspended in concentrated aqueous potassium nitrate with 
the subsequent precipitation of black powder by rapid drowning in a common organic solvent such as isopropanol. 
From this point, filtration, granulation, and drying were facile rapid processes. The resulting products were 
generally consistent from lot to lot, and approached commercial powders in performance. The method and powder 
performance test results are considered adequate fulfillment of the requirements of the program.

	For illustrative purposes, a flow chart comparing the precipitation method and a typical commercial 
procedure are shown in Figure 1. As indicated on the chart, commercial methods involve working with black 
powders containing 4% moisture, or less, with the coming mill step being considered the most hazardous of the 
operations. By contrast, the precipitation method does not involve working with a low moisture content material until 
the final product is obtained.
	
	A comparison of the burning rates of the various lots of black powders prepared during the program is 
presented in Table 1. Lots 1 through 6 represent the powders prepared initially involving the most conventional 
preparative techniques, while Lots 7 through 14 are powders produced by the precipitation method.

III. EXPERIMENTAL

	All approaches to the preparation of black powders emphasized simplicity. Initial studies were a 
modification of techniques which essentially followed the principles used in commercial procedures. This included 
methods for incorporating sulfur with charcoal, subsequent incorporation of nitrate with the blended fuel and 
pressing operations. Attempts to use field expedient means to simulate commercial black powder processes
resulted in products exhibiting poor to fair performance. Realization of the difficulties being encountered in this 
approach prompted investigation of other means of blending the ingredients, and led to precipitation techniques 
which offer a simple, novel solution to the problem. The ultimate method chosen involved solvent precipitation of 
black powder from a hot, aqueous, concentrated potassium nitrate solution containing suspended charcoal and 
sulfur. Common organic liquids such as methanol, 70% isopropanol (rubbing alcohol) and 80 proof ethanol (vodka) 
served this purpose successfully. The pyrotechnic properties of black powder prepared in this fashion approached
those of commercial black powder.

	Simplicity and safety are inherent in the method since no extensive premixing operations are required 
and the mixture can be handled in a moist form throughout the preparation. It is noteworthy that the method is 
independent of the prior particle form of the potassium nitrate since total solution of the salt is attained in the 
procedure. In addition, essentially reproducible products are obtained by this method as compared to the less 
effective methods initially investigated.

	The overall experimental work and results are described in the subsequent portion of this section. The 
description of the work is divided into three sections: an initial portion concerning the more conventional hand 
mixing techniques, a second section pertaining to the precipitation method, and a final section reporting field 
application of powders.

x

x

TABLE I
Burning Rates of the Various Black
Powder Preparations
(Note 1)

Lot No. Granulation Comments Burning Rate: cm/sec
1 10-16 mesh   12.6
2 10-16 mesh   7.7
3 Similar in size to grain of sand Sodium nitrate base 0.96
4 Dry mixed powder; no granular structure Sodium nitrate base 0.22
5 3 1/2-16 mesh   6.1
5 16-80 mesh   2.0
5 Through 80 mesh   0.95
6 10-16 mesh Cake pressed manually 2.2
6 10-16 mesh Cake pressed at 4 tons 7.7
6 10-16 mesh Cake pressed at 5 tons 8.6
6 10-16 mesh Cake pressed at 6 tons 10.7
7 10-16 mesh 100% IPA (Note 2) precipitated 16.2
8 10-16 mesh 70% IPA precipitated 18.4
9A 10-16 mesh 70% IPA precipitated 10.5
9A Riced grains 70% IPA precipitated Instantaneous
9B 10-16 mesh NaCl sat'd. 70% IPA precipitated 10.5
9B Riced grains NaCl sat'd. 70% IPA precipitated 10.5
9C 10-16 mesh KNO3 sat'd. 70% IPA precipitated Instantaneous
9C Riced grains KNO3 sat'd. 70% IPA precipitated Instantaneous
10 On 10 mesh KNO3 sat'd. 70% IPA precipitated 14.0
10 10-16 mesh KNO3 sat'd. 70% IPA precipitated 8.4
10 16-25 mesh KNO3 sat'd. 70% IPA precipitated 6.5
10 Through 25 mesh KNO3 sat'd. 70% IPA precipitated 1.4
10 Rewet riced grains KNO3 sat'd. 70% IPA precipitated 21.0
11 10-16 mesh 70% IPA precipitated 15.0
12A 10-16 mesh 80 proof vodka precipitated 12.8
12A 16-25 mesh 80 proof vodka precipitated 14.0
12A Rewet riced grains 80 proof vodka precipitated 24.8
12B 10-16 mesh 80 proof vodka precipitated 13.2
12B 16-25 mesh 80 proof vodka precipitated 13.1
12B Rewet riced grains 80 proof vodka precipitated 12.1
13A Riced grains 70% IPA precipitated 8.3
13B Riced grains Absolute methanol precipitated 11.1
14 Riced grains 70% IPA precipitated 15.0
14 Rewet riced grains 70% IPA precipitated 14.0
NOTE 1: All preparations were KNO3 based unless designated otherwise
NOTE 2: IPA - isopropyl alcohol

A. Black Powder Preparations -- Initial Phase

	The preliminary black powder formulations were made using both potassium and sodium nitrates and 
employed simple laboratory procedures. In the initial three lots the weighed or volume measured ingredients 
(column 3, Table II) were moistened with water, thoroughly blended in a mortar and pressed between two metal 
plates using moderate hydraulic pressure. The resulting cake, which was approximately one sixteenth of an inch 
thick, was oven-dried at 600C. and granulated by gentle crushing on a hard, flat surface with a length of pipe. A 
fourth lot of black powder containing sodium nitrate was prepared by a dry blending method. The volume of 
ingredients given in column 3, Table II, were placed in a three pound coffee can, fitted with a polyethylene cover, 
and the can rotated in all directions until an apparently uniform mixture was obtained. The four powders were 
evaluated for burning rate and impact sensitivity; results are given in Table II. The burning rates of the four 
compositions varied considerably; the sodium nitrate composition was the slowest burning, which is in accord with 
studies made by previous workers.

	The impact sensitivities were determined using a Bureau of Mines two-kilogram impact apparatus which 
was standardized with RDX (32 cml 10% fire level). The burning rates were determined in paper tubes 5/16-inch in
diameter and 8 inches in length. The powders were poured into weighed tubes, reweighed, and ignited by means of
a black powder fuse. The bum time was measured by means of a manual stopwatch.

	At this point, techniques were altered to emphasize the use of common household utensils in the 
preparation of black powder formulations.

TABLE II
Properties of Various Black Powder Formulations

Powder Ingredients Percentages Impact Sensitivity Burn Rate cm/sec Particle Size
Lot 1 KNO3 75 by wt. No fire at 103 cm 12.6 Through #10 sieve,
  C 15 by wt.     but not
  S 10 by wt.     through a #16
Lot 2 KNO3 58.2 by vol.   7.7 Same as Lot 1
  C 32.4 by vol.      
  S 9.4 by vol.      
Lot 3 NaNO3 72 by wt.   0.96 Similar in size to
  C 17 by wt.     grains of sand
  S 11 by wt.      
Lot 4 NaNO3 42.4 by vol. 10% fire level at 23 cm 0.22 Dry mixed powder;
  C 46.9 by vol.     no granular
  S 10.9 by vol. No fire level at 22 cm   structure
	In Lot Number 5, fifteen grams of finely ground carbon were mixed intimately with 10 grams of ground 
sulfur flour and placed in a heavy iron skillet on low heat. The mixture was heated and stirred until the constituents 
were uniform in appearance. The carbon/sulfur mixture was removed from the skillet and stirred until cool. This 
mixture was added to a previously heated solution of 75 grams of potassium nitrate in 40 milliliters of water. The 
skillet and contents were removed from the heat and stirred until a uniformly wet paste was obtained. The slightly 
moist powder was poured onto a hard, flat surface and pressed manually into a thin cake with a rolling pin. The 
powder was dried at 600C. The dried lumps were broken into uniform granules and sieved through cheesecloth 
onto a nylon scarf. The portion on the scarf was shaken until all the fine powder was sifted out. The three portions 
were evaluated or the burning rate as described in the previous section with the following results:				
  cm/sec.
Powdered portion through scarf (<80 mesh) 0.95
Portion remaining on scarf (80 -- 16 mesh) 2.0
Portion retained on cheesecloth (16 - 3 1/2 mesh) 6.1
	Separation of the various particle sizes aided in demonstrating effectiveness of particle size on ultimate 
performance in field applications.

	Lot Number 6 was a 500-gram quantity of powder prepared in a manner similar to that described for 
evaluation of pressure effects on the moist powder. Burning rate tests similar to those previously described were 
used as the criteria for evaluation. The moist powder was divided into four approximately equal portions and treated
in the following manner: one portion was pressed manually on a flat surface with a rolling pin as described above, 
and the remaining three portions of the wet powder were pressed between two flat metal plates using four, five, and
six tons of pressure. The actual pressure area on the powders corresponded to a circle about three inches in 
diameter. The four samples of powder were dried, broken and sieved to produce particles passing through a 
number 10 sieve, but retained on a number 16 sieve. The results were as follows:
  Burn Rate cm/sec.
Powder pressed manually 2.2
Powder pressed at 4 tons pressure 7.7
Powder pressed at 5 tons pressure 8.6
Powder pressed at 6 tons pressure 10.7
	Pressure tends to incorporate the ingredients and, as indicated above, increases the burning rate 
considerably.

B. Black Powder Preparation by the Precipitation Method

Difficulty in obtaining an intimate mixture of components in the preparation of various black powders using modified 
commercial methods led to the investigation of techniques incorporating a salting-out procedure employing organic 
solvents. This procedure, in conjunction with the use of several common variety store items, resulted in the 
production of a black powder considered to be nearly equivalent to commercial black powder.

Lot No. 7
Potassium nitrate (tech. grade) 150 g.
Charcoal 30 g.
Sulfur 20 g.
	The components were intimately mixed and added to 100 mi. of hot water in an iron skillet. Heating was 
continued and water added in small increments until the potassium nitrate was dissolved. The hot mixture was 
poured into approximately 300 mi. of isopropanol, allowed to cool, and the solids separated by filtration through a 
nylon stocking. The moist solid was rolled into a flat cake, approximately 1/4" thick, allowed to dry overnight, and 
crushed with a rolling pin. The burning rate of the 10-16 mesh product was 16.2 cm per second.

Lot No. 8
Potassium nitrate (tech. grade) 75 g.
Charcoal 15 g.
Sulfur 10 g.
Water 75 ml
Isopropanol, 70% 200 ml
	The procedure employed was essentially identical to that used for Lot No. 7 with the exception that the 
volume of water was measured and 70% isopropanol was employed. The burning rate of the 10-16 mesh powder 
was 18.4 cm per second.

Lot No. 9
Potassium nitrate (tech. grade) 340 g.
Charcoal 68 g.
Sulfur 45 g.
Water 325 ml
Isopropanol, 70% 500 ml
Isopropanol, 70% (saturated with NaCl) 250 ml
Isopropanol, 70% (saturated with KNO3) 250 ml
	Preparatory procedure, as previously described, was followed with the exception that the lot was divided 
into three portions prior to precipitation:

	9A - 	1/2 of lot precipitated in 500 mi. 70% isopropanol
	9B - 	1/4 of lot precipitated in 250 mi. 70% isopropanol saturated with NaCl
	9C - 	5/4 of lot precipitated in 250 mi. 70% isopropanol saturated with KNO3

	Each sub-lot was ultimately divided into quarters to accomplish air and oven drying and compare 
granulation methods as outlined in Table III.

							TABLE III
			         	          Burn Rate (cm/sec)
Sub-Batch Granulation (mesh) Air Dried Oven Dried
(2 hrs. @ 900C)
9A 10-16 10.5 11.0
9B 10-16 10.5 8.0
9C 10-16 Instantaneous 11.0
9A Riced grains* Instantaneous 11.1
9B Riced grains* 10.5 8.1
9CC Riced grains* Instantaneous 11.0
*Granulation accomplished using a household potato ricer (Figure 2). A typical particle range of such a 
powder is  75%, 10 -16 mesh and 25%, 16-25 mesh admired with a small quantity of fines.

							(Potato Ricer)
			    				FIGURE 2
	Lot No. 10
Potassium nitrate 1020 g.
Charcoal 204 g.
Sulfur 136 g.
Water 900 ml
Isopropanol, 70% 3000 ml
	Composition and procedure were identical to that employed in the previous lot. The primary objective was
the determination of burning rates of the powder in various size ranges.

							TABLE IV
Granulation (mesh) Burning Rate (cm/sec)
10 14.0
10-16 8.4
16-25 6.5
25 1.4
Riced, Rewet* 21.0
*This was accomplished by moistening the original powder with 70% isopropanol, granulating with a ricer 
and air  drying.

	Lot No. 11
Potassium nitrate 340 g.
Charcoal 68 g.
Sulfur 44 g.
Water 300 ml
Isopropanol 70% 1000 ml
	Untreated 70% isopropanol was employed since the salt-saturated material used in Lot No. 9 and Lot 
No. 10 did not produce a powder with any significant superiority. In this, and subsequent lots, cotton cloth was used
as a filter material rather than nylon. The precipitate was divided into two portions, half of which was air dried and 
half oven dried. Results of burning rate tests were as follows:
Air dried 10-16 mesh 15 cm/sec.
Oven dried 10-16 mesh 13.1 cm/sec.
	(2 hrs. @ 90 deg. C.)

	Lot No. 12
Potassium nitrate 340 g.
Charcoal 68 g.
Sulfur 44 g.
Water 300 ml
Vodka (80 proof) 500 ml
Vodka (80 proof) Sat. w/KNO3 500 ml
	Universal availability dictated that vodka be given consideration as a precipitation medium in the field 
preparation of black powder. Initial preparation was as previously outlined; the lot divided into two equal parts and 
precipitated in vodka with (12A) and without nitrate saturation (12B). One half of each sub-lot was rolled, air dried, 
crushed and screened into definite granulation ranges; and the second half forced through a potato ricer and 
allowed to air dry. Burning rates of the resulting powders are given in Table V.

							TABLE V
  | ------- Burning Rates (cm/sec) ------- |
Sub-Batch Air Dried & Crushed Riced (rewet*)
Granulation (mesh) 10-16 16-25  
12A 12.8 14.0 24.8
12B 13.2 13.1 12.1
*See footnote on Table IV.

A question of nitrate loss through solubility in the precipitation method prompted the retention of solvent after 
removal of solids in a lot similar in composition to Lot No. 9. Evaporation of the isopropanol yielded 61.7 g. of KNO3 
representing a weight loss in the powder of 18.1%. Compensation for this loss results in a 78/13.2/8.8 composition.

	Lot No. 13
Potassium nitrate 880 g.
Charcoal 150 g.
Sulfur 100 g.
Water 600 ml
	The composition adjusted to account for nitrate solubility loss as determined above, was mixed as 
previously described and divided into two equal parts. 13A was precipitated in 2400 ml. of 70% isopropanol, and 
13B was precipitated in 2400 mi. of absolute methanol, and both sub-lots were put through a potato ricer prior to air
drying. The burning rates of 13A and 13B were 8.3 and 11.1 cm/sec respectively.

	Lot No. 14 
  Parts by Volume
Potassium nitrate 3 cups (6)
Charcoal 2 cups (4)
Sulfur 0.5 cups (1)
Water 3 cups (6)
Rubbing alcohol (70% isopropanol) 5 pints (10)
	As indicated, volume measurements were made of the ingredients. Blending was performed in the normal
fashion with the exception that the fuels were added to previously dampened nitrate to eliminate working with the 
oxidizer-fuel system in the dry state. The filtration was accomplished using a linen towel. After air drying to a slightly
moist consistency, the material was granulated using a potato ricer and sun dried for one hour. The bum rate was 
determined to be 15 cm/sec. Re-wetting and re-ricing did not appreciably alter this particular product (14 cm/sec.). 
Weight-volume relationships for the various ingredients are given in Table VI.

							TABLE VI
						Weight-Volume Relationship
						of Ingredient of Black Powder
  Approximate Weight (gms) of
Ingredient one cup (8 fluid ounces)
Potassium nitrate (N.F. granulated) 270
Charcoal (wood, powdered) 75
Sulfur (U.S.P., precipitated powder) 200
C. Application Tests
	One pound of black powder, as produced for Lot No. 5, contained in a 12" x 2-1/2" plastic tube was 
placed in a 36" x 2-3/4" hole, fused and covered with soil. On ignition, a hole approximately 20 inches in diameter 
was produced.

	Three pounds of black powder, as produced for Lot No. 13A was contained in a coffee can and buried 
42" deep. Ignition produced a crater six feet in diameter.

	While actual force or impulse measurements were not taken, powders prepared by the precipitation 
method are considered acceptable for blasting purposes. Extensive testing is considered essential to completely 
delineate their capabilities under all environmental conditions.

	Several propellant grains were prepared from powders similar to Lot No. 11 and Lot No. 13A, both loosely
packed and pressed to several tons. In each case the powder exploded when ignited in a nozzled chamber 
indicating the need for a modifier to control the burning rate.

	Three pounds of powder were prepared in a manner similar to that described in 13A except that 270 
grams of soluble starch was intimately mixed with the wet Powder prior to ricing. Subsequent to air drying, the 
composition was re-wet with 10% water, and two 1-1/4"-cylinders having 1/8" center holes were pressed at five tons.
The grains weighed 50 grams each and after air drying were incorporated into rocket configuration shown in
Figure 3. After addition of fuse and ignition material, the unit, which weighed 580 grams, functioned as anticipated 
and attained an altitude of 400 feet.

x

	While the allotted time did not allow for extensive studies involving areas other than nitrate black 
powders, a brief investigation was made of chlorate as an oxidizer and sugar as a fuel. Chlorate powders are 
inherently sensitive and, therefore, pose a problem especially where inexperienced personnel are concerned.

	For instance, one small batch of 75% KClO3, 12.5% S, 12.5% C, prepared by wet blending in isopropanol
exhibited an impact sensitivity of 15 cm (10% fire level). RDX gave a value of 32 cm. Other compositions prepared 
include 75% KCl03, 25% sugar, 20 cm; 60% KCl03, 40% sugar, 46 cm; 60% KClO3, 20% C, 20% S, 7 cm; and 60% 
KClO3, 35% sugar, 50% C, 10 cm. Also, these mixtures were prepared using solvent blending. In addition, a 
promising "white powder," namely potassium nitrate sugar, was briefly investigated. Such a composition was 
prepared and evaluated in the following manner: Sixty-five grams of potassium nitrate and 35 grams of granulated
cane sugar were placed in an iron skillet and sufficient water added in increments with heating and stirring until 
solution was affected. Shortly after the mixture began to boil, a precipitate formed resulting in a white slurry. Stirring 
was continued until the mass changed with additional heating from a crystalline slurry to a smooth homogeneous
mass. At this point, the material was poured onto a flat surface and worked by rubbing with the wooden stirring rod 
into small lumps. If the mixture is allowed to cool without stirring, a single mass is formed which is very difficult to 
granulate. The burning rate of the 10-16 mesh product was 9.3 cm/sec.

	This approach to indigenous pyrotechnics should warrant further study from a standpoint of fuel 
selection, oxidizer selection and fabrication techniques. Previous investigations have shown KN03-sugar 
compositions to be satisfactory propellants.

IV. CONCLUSIONS

	1. Black powders prepared in the field by simple mechanical mixing are of inferior quality with respect to
burning rate. Attempts to use simple utensils for preparing black powder in accordance with commercial processes 
results in, at best, a mediocre product.
	
	2. A simple, facile precipitation process involving the salting out of nitrate oxidizer onto the charcoal-sulfur
fuel using common organic solvents affords a satisfactory black powder. This product exhibits a burning rate 
approaching that of commercial powder, produces favorable cratering effects and, with modification, can be 
successfully used as a rocket propellant.

	3. Attempts to adjust the precipitation method to account for nitrate solubility in the solvents did not
improve the product and, in certain cases, yielded inferior materials. In part, this might be attributed to an oxidizer-
rich surface of the black powder being formed as a result of the adjustments.

Appendix A
FIELD EXPEDIENT PREPARATION OF BLACK POWDERS

Preparation of Black Powder:

	Potassium nitrate black powder may be prepared in a simple, safe manner. The formulation described 
below will result in approximately 1-1/2 pounds of black powder, which may be used as blasting or rifle powder.

Material Required:
	• Heat source such as a kitchen stove (or an open fire, if it is the only available source)
	• Two-gallon bucket (metal or plastic)
	• Cooking pan or skillet; 4 quart capacity
	• Flat window screen, at least i-foot square
	• Large wooden spoon or stick
	• Plain weave cloth sheet (at least 2 feet square)
	• Measuring cup (8 ounces)
	• Potassium nitrate (granulated)
	• Powdered wood charcoal
	• Powdered sulfur
	• Rubbing alcohol (70% isopropyl alcohol) or wood (methyl) alcohol
	• Water

Procedure:
	
	1. Measure by volume, 3 cups of granulated potassium nitrate, 2 cups of powdered charcoal, and 1/2 cup
of powdered sulfur into the 4-quart pan (or skillet), and moisten with 1 cup of water. Using a wooden stick or spoon, 
thoroughly mix the ingredients.

	2. Add 2 additional cups of water to the mixture and place the pan on the heating source. Allow the liquid 
to come to a simmer with sufficient stirring to obtain an evenly mixed blend. With vigorous stirring, rapidly pour this 
mixture into five pints of alcohol contained in the two-gallon bucket.

	3. After the alcohol mixture has been allowed to stand about 5 minutes, collect the black powder by 
straining the entire contents through the cloth. Remove as much liquid as possible by wrapping the cloth around the
powder and squeezing the resulting bag.

	4. Spread the wet powder in a thin layer (1/2 inch thick) on a flat surface and allow to dry to a slightly 
moist solid. Place the screen over the bucket which has been cleaned and dried from the operation described in 
Step 2. Place a workable amount of the moist powder on the screen and granulate by hand, rubbing the solid 
through the screen. If the particles collected in the bucket appear to stick together and change in shape, recombine
the entire batch, redry, and repeat the granulation operation.

	5. Dry the granulated black powder by spreading on a flat surface in about a 1/2-inch layer. Sun drying is
preferred for this step.

End of Book

Return to Self-Reliance>>Weapons>>Black Powder page.

Please Read The Website Disclaimer!
Copyright 1986-2009, The Survival & Self-Reliance Studies Institute (SSRsi), All Rights Reserved
Site conceptualized, designed, created & maintained by MEG Raven
Snail Mail: SSRsi, PO Box 2572 Dillon, CO. 80435-2572