~ SSRsi PDF Library Previews ~

Flora Medica: A Botanical Account
of all the more Important Plants

By John Lindley
696 pages 1858

Intuition  ~  Creativity  ~  Adaptability
Home Page
Table of Contents
Emergencies
Family Affairs
Natural Disasters
New World Order
Outdoor Survival
Self-Reliance
Shortages
TEOTWAWKI
Terrorism & Terrorists
United States Government
War & Military
Other Stuff


Contact SSRsi
News, Ads and Chat
Support SSRsi
Reciprocal Links


SSRsi OnLine Store
Get Firefox!

This book is included in the Outdoor Survival Basics section.

wwhmurray1

Preface
There are probably few persons engaged in teaching Botany to medical students in this country, who have not experienced great inconvenience from the want of some work in which correct systematical descriptions of medicinal plants are to be found, and which is cheap enough to be used as a class book. By the author, at least, this has been so strongly felt, that he would long since have made the present attempt at supplying the deficiency had he been a medical man, or had he not hoped in each succeeding year that such a work would have appeared from the pen of some writer of reputation, both as a botanist and pharmacologist. This expectation has not been realised; the necessity that students should have access to a botanical account of the plants which furnish the substances used medicinally in different parts of the world, daily becomes more urgent; and hence the work now presented to the public makes its appearance.

Under existing arrangements it is chiefly from systematical works treating of the British Flora, that the student of Botany derives his acquaintance with species; and as but a small number of the plants found wild in this country are either officinal, or of much medical value, he is practically excluded from any acquaintance with those important exotic species which it is most desirable for him so to study as to recognise them when he sees them. The student therefore who is really anxious to study Botany for those great purposes which render it so indispensable a branch of medical science, has been obliged to remain satisfied with such general knowledge as he can obtain from books like the author's Natural System of Botany. His examination in practical Botany becomes alarming to him because he is necessarily ill-prepared to meet it; and when passed, all but the theory of the science is too apt to quit his memory, from the want of definite points upon which his attention can be permanently fixed.

But there is another reason which has induced the author to take up the investigation of medical plants. All persons at all conversant with Materia Medica, are aware how conflicting are the statements found in books, and made in conversation, respecting the sources from which medicinal plants, often of the commonest kind, are derived.

For instance, one writer says that Cubebs are obtained from Sierra Leone, where Piper Cubeba does not grow: another refers the origin of this pepper, in Bourbon, to Piper caudatum, which is a Brazilian, not an African species; a third asserts that Cubebs come from Java, and are the fruit of Piper caninum, not of P. Cubeba. Cascarilla bark is assigned by one writer to Croton Cascarilla, by another to C. pseudo-china, and by a third to C. Eleuteria. Rhubarb has been said by different writers to be the root of Rheum palmatum, R. undulatum, and R. Emodi; and in all these cases the assertion has been made with equal confidence. According to one author Sarsaparilla is the root of Smilax officinalis; to another, of Smilax medica; to a third, of Smilax aspera; to others, of a species called S. Sarsaparilla. I have even heard it stated with great confidence, that of the few kinds of vegetable drugs admitted into the last edition of the Pharmacopoeia of the College of Physicians, twelve are referred to plants which certainly do not produce them; and that twenty-six others have been assigned to their sources with more or less inaccuracy. As the greater part of these differences of opinion can be more readily settled by Botanical investigation than by Pharmaceutical evidence, the author trusts that it will not be thought presumptuous in him to have made the attempt, although he is not a medical man.

In executing his task he has been much embarrassed to determine within what limits to confine it. To be guided by the last edition of the London Pharmacopoeia, or by any other work of the same description, would have manifestly been inexpedient, because all such books are from their very nature circumscribed, and confined in their application to some particular place. To have thus limited the present work, would have entirely defeated one of the first objects set before himself by the author in the execution of it the indication of what remedial agents are employed in other countries, but not yet introduced into English practice. No one will be bold enough to assert that the physician already possesses the most powerful agents produced by the vegetable kingdom; for every year is bringing some new plant into notice for its energy, while others are excluded because of their inertness. In tropical countries, where a fervid sun, a humid air, and a teeming soil give extraordinary energy to vegetable life, the natives of those regions often recognise the existence of potent herbs unknown to the European practitioner. No doubt such virtues are often as fabulous, and imaginary, as those of indigenous plants long since rejected by the sagacity of European practice. But we are not altogether to despise the experience of nations less advanced in knowledge than ourselves, or to suppose because they may ascribe imaginary virtues to some of their officinal substances, as has been abundantly done by ourselves in former days, that therefore the remedial properties of their plants are not worth a serious investigation; or that their medical knowledge is beneath our notice because they are unacquainted with the terms of modern science. It is not much above twenty years since an English officer in India was cured of gonorrhoea by his native servant, after the skill of regular European practitioners had been exhausted: the remedy employed was Cubebs, the importance of which was previously unknown, and the rationale of whose action is to this day beyond the discovery of physiologists. It is of undoubted value in urethral catarrh: and who shall say that there are not hundreds of equally powerful remedies still remaining to be discovered. Look to Hemidesmus indicus, the source of Indian Sarsaparilla, the most active medicine of that name now known to the English physician, although excluded from the Pharmacopoeia; to Chloranthus officinalis, unrivalled in Java for its aromatic properties and powerful stimulating effects; to Soymida febrifuga, Galipea officinalis, and Cedrela Toona, which, at least, rival the Jesuit's bark in their influence over the most dangerous fevers; to Erythroxylon Coca one of the most active stimulants of the nervous system; or, finally, consider the accounts we have of the effects of Jamaica Dogwood, Piscidia Erythrina, which, if there is any truth in medical reports, must be a narcotic superior to opium for many purposes; and it must be sufficiently apparent to all unprejudiced minds, that the resources of the vegetable kingdom, far from being exhausted, have hardly yet been called into existence. It is presumptuous for the theorist to assert that he already possesses a remedy " for all the maladies that flesh is heir to;" it is mere idleness in the routine practitioner, carried away by the attraction of specious generalities, to fancy that one tonic is as good as another tonic, or one purgative as another purgative. In reality the true cause of the different actions of medicines upon the human body is admitted by the highest authorities to be wholly unknown; and surely this is in itself the best of all reasons why we should not assume that we already possess against disease all the remedies which nature affords; on the contrary, it should stimulate us to reiterated enquiries into the peculiar action of new remedial agents.

The medical student rarely knows, at the time when he is acquiring his professional education, what his after destiny will be. A large proportion of the young men who frequent the class-rooms are scattered to all the corners of the earth; they are perpetually liable to be cut off from supplies of the drugs of the Pharmacopoeia, and then are driven upon their own resources; and they find the medicines which are powerful in Europe, comparatively inactive in other climates. The heat of a country, its humidity, particular localities, food, and the social habits of a people will predispose them to varieties of disease for which the drugs of Europe offer no sufficient remedy, and will render that which is relied ' upon in one country unworthy of dependence in another. Thus the Cinchona bark of Peru, important as it is in Europe, is, we are told, rejected by the people among whom it grows, because it is found too stimulating and heating for their excitable constitutions. And speaking of Ipecacuanha Dr. Von Martius, who so carefully examined practically the Materia Medica of Brazil, asserts " nullum est dubium quin Emetica in terris zonae fervidae subjectis effectus producent multo magis salutares quam in regionibus frigidioribus."

This last observation seems to indicate, that if emetic plants are so much more common in hot than cold countries; it is because there is so much greater a necessity for them. The late Mr. Burnett, and many other persons, have asserted that every country spontaneously furnishes remedies for those maladies which the people of the soil are naturally subject to, and that the foreign drugs imported into the markets of Europe would soon be superseded to a great extent, if the properties of European plants were carefully examined. It is contended, in illustration of this opinion, that Salicine, obtained from our native Willows is equal in energy to Quinine, and that it is formed by Providence in low marshy places, exactly where remittent and intermittent fevers are experienced most frequently, and with the greatest severity. It is not for the author to offer an opinion upon a point of this sort; his business here is only with facts, or what are believed to be facts. It is, however, deserving of notice, that if England is already found to yield species of such powerful action as Hellebore, Hemlock, Henbane, Belladonna, Stramonium, Foxglove, Willow bark, Holly leaves, Spurge Laurel, Centaury, Colchicum, Bryony, Ergot, and many more, it becomes probable that other powerful agents still remain to be discovered in this country. Such a subject of investigation is by no means unimportant, when it is considered how wretchedly inadequate in too many cases is the remuneration of medical men, and how much the practitioner would often be relieved, if his expenses could be diminished by the substitution of domestic remedies, to be had for the trouble of getting them, in place of exotic drugs which are not only costly, but often so much adulterated as to be unfit for use. When we consider the quality of much of the Scammony, Sarsaparilla, Senna, and even Rhubarb that are sold in the shops, it is surely not extravagant to expect that they should often be advantageously rejected for some of the plants which grow almost at our doors. Our marshes are overrun with the Iris Pseudacorus, an active purgative and emetic; Ranunculus Flammula another common plant is described by Dr. Withering, the introducer of Digitalis into practice, as the best of all known emetics; and the common Lilac, which, although not a native, is to be found in every garden, has fruit which in its unripe state is singularly bitter, and yields an extract spoken of as a remarkably good tonic and febrifuge.

They were considerations of this kind which decided the author to include in his work all the plants whether indigenous or exotic, and whether officinal or not, the properties of which were sufficiently well attested to deserve particular notice. Those plants have however been omitted, whatever their reputation may have been, against the efficiency of which medical opinion has been distinctly and generally expressed. Such exceptions as may be found to this rule, have usually been made for purposes connected with the lecture-room, or for the sake of calling attention to plants whose properties seem to deserve further investigation.

It by no means follows that plants are inert because medical men have reported unfavourably of their action. The most powerful species have had their energy destroyed by unskilful preparation, or by not knowing at what season to collect them. Orfila says, " We were one day in the shop of an apothecary who had several times furnished us with extract of hemlock, which we had administered to dogs, to the dose of 10 drachms without producing any serious accident. We endeavoured to prove to him that the medicine was badly prepared, and in order to convince him effectually, we swallowed, in the presence of several persons who happened to be in his shop, a drachm of this extract (72 grains) dissolved in two drachms of water. We felt no ill effect from it, whilst 20 to 30 grains of the extract, well prepared, would probably have proved fatal to us." This observation upon the badness of shop preparations of this drug is confirmed by Mr. Pereira; and Dr. Christison considers it absolutely necessary to begin the inquiry into its effects anew, the preparations hitherto employed being of very little energy, or absolutely inert. Dr. Hancock makes the same remark upon shop Sarsaparilla.

If it should appear that many exotic plants have been admitted, the importance of which is possibly not greater than that of many European plants which have been rejected, it should also be considered, that the latter have been expelled from practice upon definite grounds, and that no such careful investigation of the former has yet been made; moreover, the very nature of the climate of tropical countries generally causes the properties of plants to be more concentrated and completely elaborated than in northern latitudes. It may possibly be said that numerous species have been admitted, the properties of which are dietetic or poisonous rather than medicinal. In noticing alimentary plants the author has followed the example of the College of Physicians who admit Barley, Wheat, Oats, Arrow-root, Sago, &c. into the Pharmacopoeia; and he has endeavoured to select such alimentary plants only as furnish the diet of a sick person. With respect to poisons it is to be remembered that the energy which renders them dangerous if taken in excess, may also cause them to be, in the hands of skilful practitloners, most valuable remedial agents. A medical man should also be aware of their existence, as he may at any time be called upon to counteract their effects.

In arranging his materials the author has generally noticed at greatest length those plants which he supposes to be most important; while others are either very shortly described, or only mentioned by name. It will be found, that the technical descriptions have been carefully framed in accordance with the existing state of Botanical knowledge, and according to the most approved rules of modern science. The student will therefore be able to use them as models upon which to familiarise himself with the art of descriptive Botany. Nevertheless, it has not been thought necessary to provide in all cases original descriptions; and consequently although a great many are so, many others are only amended, altered, or corrected from the works of other Botanists. In such a collection of facts as this is much originality can hardly be expected; it will however be found, upon reference to the articles Cinchona, Croton, Rheum, Convolvulus, and others, that original investigation has not been neglected when it seemed to be required.

It will be generally found that the authorities for the medicinal properties ascribed to species are those of the writers whose works are quoted among the Botanical references; if it is not so the exact authority for a statement is usually expressly mentioned.

For the convenience of those who may wish to use this work as a catalogue of the contents of the Medicinal department of a Botanic Garden, all the species are numbered consecutively; and it is intended that the same numbers should be preserved, in case the work should ever reach a second edition; all additions being introduced with letters after the numbers next to which they may be placed. This intimation is given for the satisfaction of those who may be desirous of combining the -advantage of a catalogue with the information the work contains.

In the present state of systematical Botany no two writers upon classification can agree respecting the exact sequence in which the natural orders of plants should follow each other. By some the plan of Jussieu is adopted, by others that of De Candolle, and by many the systems of Endlicher, of the author of this work, of Von Martius, of Schultz, or even of Reichenbach may be preferred. This can only be accounted for upon the supposition that the systems of all these authors are equally false. To enable the reader of this book to suit his own convenience in the arrangement of the matter, the work is so printed that the different natural orders may be cut asunder and re-arranged at the pleasure of the possessor; some space has necessarily been sacrificed to this object, but it is hoped that a corresponding degree of convenience will attend it. The scheme is, however, only a matter of experiment, and will be abandoned hereafter if it should appear not to be of general advantage. As the work leaves the publisher's hands the sequence of matter corresponds with that of the author's Natural System of Botany, because it will probably be that preferred by the majority of readers in this country.

It only remains to notice the sources from which the information contained in this work has been procured. As all the Pharmacological works of most repute have been occasionally more or less consulted, it may appear almost invidious to name any one in particular from which such information has been gleaned more than from others. It is, however, an act of the merest justice to say, that the valuable work of Guibourt, the excellent lectures on Materia Medica by Mr. Pereira, published in the Medical Gazette, and Dr. Royle's various writings have furnished the author with the most valuable part of his information upon doubtful points.
LONDON, June 14. 1838.

End of Preview.

RETURN to Main Titles Index or Outdoor Survival Basics

Please Read The Website Disclaimer!
Copyright 1986-2009, The Survival & Self-Reliance Studies Institute (SSRsi), All Rights Reserved
Site conceptualized, designed, created & maintained by MEG Raven
Snail Mail: SSRsi, PO Box 2572 Dillon, CO. 80435-2572