~ SSRsi PDF Library Previews ~

Inquiry Into the Power of Juries to Decide Incidentally on Questions of Law
By George Worthington 
70 pages 1840

Intuition  ~  Creativity  ~  Adaptability
Home Page
Table of Contents
Emergencies
Family Affairs
Natural Disasters
New World Order
Outdoor Survival
Self-Reliance
Shortages
TEOTWAWKI
Terrorism & Terrorists
United States Government
War & Military
Other Stuff


Contact SSRsi
News, Ads and Chat
Support SSRsi
Reciprocal Links


SSRsi OnLine Store
Get Firefox!

This book is included in the US Government: Educational, Informational & Motivational section.

wwhmurray1

Preface
The duties of juries have been for a long period so well defined, by the practice of the courts; and modern juries are so little inclined to assume undue power, that the subject of this Inquiry has lost much of its interest. But its importance can never be diminished

Eminent writers have contended for the propriety of juries showing the most respectful deference to the advice and recommendation of judges, on points of law. It is the subject of this Inquiry to demonstrate that, on every point of law, juries are bound to obey the direction of the judge presiding at the trial.

The author of Eunomus, or Dialogues concerning the Law and Constitution of England, has, in a pleasing manner, and by a powerful train of reasoning, supported the opinion which is advocated in the following pages. He observes, that the contrary notion has been made use of, chiefly in the case of libels; and, perhaps, would never have been contended for as a general doctrine, if it had not been to serve particular purposes. The only time (he adds) for a calm and dispassionate inquiry on such points, is when the event is at a distance, and the voice of faction is silent.

Those persons who may not have access to old law books; or, those who may feel disinclined to remove the learned dust reposing on the unopened folios, will, it is hoped, find in the following pages sufficient materials to enable them to form an accurate opinion on the question. It is apprehended, that the most satisfactory mode of treating any legal question is by simple quotations from established authorities; and that the writer on legal subjects is not justified in offering argument, or opinion, independently of such authorities. It is in this manner that the present work has been composed; and its only pretensions, therefore, to merit, are founded on an anxious desire to perform, with fidelity and care, a laborious and humble task.
G. Worthington


End of Preview.

RETURN to Main Titles Index or US Government: Educational, Informational & Motivational

Please Read The Website Disclaimer!
Copyright 1986-2012, The Survival & Self-Reliance Studies Institute (SSRsi), All Rights Reserved
Site conceptualized, designed, created & maintained by MEG Raven
Snail Mail: SSRsi, PO Box 2572 Dillon, CO. 80435-2572