This book is included in the Anti-Terror, Terrorism & Terrorists section.
Mass Medical Care with Scarce Resources
A Community Planning Guide
~ : ~
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: 2007
ABOUT THIS GUIDE
Purpose of the Guide
The purpose of this guide is to provide community planners – as well as planners at the facility/community, State, and Federal levels – with valuable information and insights that will help them in their efforts to plan for and respond to a mass casualty event (MCE). This guide provides information on:
This information will be useful in helping planners address the issues associated with preparing for and responding to an MCE in the context of broader emergency planning processes, such as those laid out in Standing Together: An Emergency Planning Guide for America’s Communities, published by the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 2005.
This document is intended not to reflect Department of Health and Human Services policy but to provide State and local planners with options to consider when planning their response to an MCE.
Development of the Guide
This guide builds and expands on an earlier document published by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) that explored the issues and outlined the principles associated with the provision of medical care in the face of overwhelming numbers of casualties. It is the product of collaboration between the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (formerly the Office of Public Health Emergency Preparedness) and AHRQ, who co-edited the guide. Leading experts were identified and a series of papers was commissioned to address issues pertaining to six critical fields related to mass casualty care. Working individually or as parts of writing teams, the experts prepared drafts of their papers, which were presented for discussion among a broader group of experts at a meeting held in Washington, DC, on June 1–2, 2006. The writers incorporated much of the discussion and input from that meeting into their respective chapters. The list of meeting participants, including lead authors and the members of the writing teams, is presented in Appendix A.
Contents
Executive Summary
Chapter I. Introduction
Chapter II. Ethical Considerations in Community Disaster Planning
Chapter III. Assessing the Legal Environment Concerning Mass Casualty Event Planning and Response
Chapter IV. Prehospital Care
Chapter V. Hospital/Acute Care
Chapter VI. Alternative Care Sites
Chapter VII. Palliative Care
Chapter VIII. Influenza Pandemic Case Study
Appendix A. Participant List
Appendix B. Bibliography
Executive Summary
Background
In the event of a catastrophic public health- or terrorism-related event, such as an influenza pandemic or the detonation of improvised nuclear devices, the resulting tens of thousands of victims will be likely to overwhelm the resources of a community’s health care system. In this dire scenario, which we refer to as a mass casualty event (MCE), it will be necessary to allocate scarce resources in a manner that is different from usual circumstances but appropriate to the situation. Making optimal decisions concerning the allocation of scarce resources could make a big difference in the degree to which health care systems continue to function; ultimately it could mean saving many thousands of lives.
Purpose of the Guide
The purpose of this guide is to provide community planners – as well as planners at the facility/community, State, and Federal levels – with valuable insights and information that will help them in their efforts to plan for and respond to an MCE. The guide aims to present planners with approaches and strategies that would enable them to provide the most appropriate standards of care possible under the circumstances of an MCE.
This document is intended not to reflect Department of Health and Human Services policy but to provide State and local planners with options to consider when planning their response to an MCE.
Development of the Guide
This guide builds and expands on an earlier document published by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Altered Standards of Care in Mass Casualty Events (available on the AHRQ Web site at http://www.ahrq.gov/research/altstand/) explored the issues and outlined the principles associated with the provision of medical care in the face of overwhelming numbers of casualties.
This planning guide is the product of a collaborative effort between AHRQ and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (formerly the Office of Public Health Emergency Preparedness).
Organization of the Guide
This planning guide looks at issues and challenges in MCE response and preparedness issues across the spectrum of health care settings and provides recommendations for planners specific to each area. The planning guide begins with a discussion of the ethical and legal considerations and then discusses issues related to MCE planning in three care settings: prehospital, hospital and acute care, and alternative care sites (ACSs). This is followed by a discussion of palliative care issues, which must be integrated throughout the planning for and response to an MCE. The planning guide concludes with a presentation of a case study: an influenza pandemic.
Ethical Considerations
We live in a world where a whole range of manmade and natural disasters are of increasing concern to communities across the Nation. Terrorism, epidemics, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, and fires are all too possible in an industrialized and increasingly interdependent world. For this reason, serious and systematic disaster planning and preparedness at the community level are absolutely essential. If or when a disaster occurs, communities must be prepared for the possibility that the arrival of government assistance may be delayed. Indeed, potentially significant interruptions in the deployment of medical assistance may occur in certain kinds of events (e.g., pandemic influenza) or in situations in which several events occur simultaneously. Government agencies at all levels may be overstretched by multiple challenges and competing demands or have their ability to function degraded by catastrophic events.
Hurricane Katrina, for example, demonstrated that communications systems may be damaged or temporarily severed at the outset of a disaster. While such systems are being reestablished or put in place, local communities that have planned for such a possibility will have a head start on meeting community care needs.
Indeed, one reality is clear: communities that have not planned and prepared for such an eventuality will be less equipped to face the complexities of such an event than communities that have planned. Moreover, once a planning process is undertaken, it will become clear that serious ethical decisions are central to shaping any community’s disaster response. It is important to realize that once a disaster strikes, difficult choices will have to be made, and the more fully the ethical issues raised by such choices are discussed prior to making them, the greater the potential for the choices to be ethically sound. The ethical issues and considerations in MCE planning are discussed in Chapter II.
Legal Issues
Laws at all levels of government are a critical part of emergency responses and allocation decisions involving scarce resources in an MCE. Legal issues that need to be considered in the context of MCE planning include understanding the changing legal landscape during emergencies, the balance of individual and communal interests, the suspension of existing legal requirements, interjurisdictional legal coordination issues, medical licensure reciprocity, liability and other protections for health care workers and volunteers, property management and control, and legal triage.
Chapter III contains a detailed discussion of relevant laws and their potential impact on the ability of planners to allocate scarce resources during an MCE.
Prehospital Care
In the event of an MCE, the emergency medical services (EMS) systems will be called on to provide first-responder rescue, assessment, care, and transportation and access to the emergency medical health care system. The bulk of EMS in this country is provided through a complex system of highly variable organizational structures. While efforts are ongoing to standardize EMS disaster training, no single oversight agency is responsible for ensuring consistency in training, certification, or guidelines for disaster response; the use of personal protective equipment; or the coordination of EMS response and operations.
The unique context in which EMS systems operate in this country serves to amplify the challenges of providing emergency medical services in the context of an MCE. The issues and challenges of providing such services are discussed in Chapter IV.
Hospital and Acute Care
The overall goal of hospital and acute care response to an MCE is to maximize care across the greatest number of people while meeting at least minimal obligations for care to all who are in need. In the case of an MCE, however, hospitals will not have access to many needed resources. Thus, some of the most difficult decisions about providing an appropriate standard of medical care in an environment of scarce resources will be made in hospitals.
The major challenges that hospitals will face in an MCE include surge capacity issues, the fact that they are already at or near capacity for emergency and trauma services, a lack of on-call specialists and nurses, the need to coordinate between competing health care systems, incompatibilities in communications systems, and the need for security and protection, to name just a few. The issues related to MCE planning and response in the hospital sector are discussed in detail in Chapter V.
ACSs
The impact of an MCE of any significant magnitude likely will overwhelm hospitals and other traditional venues for health care services. Indeed, it may render them inoperable, necessitating the establishment of ACSs for the provision of care that normally would be provided in an inpatient facility. Advance planning is critical to the establishment and operation of ACSs; this planning must be coordinated with existing health care facilities as well as home care entities. Planners must delineate the specific medical functions and treatment objectives of the ACS. The principle of managing patients under relatively austere conditions, with only limited supplies, equipment, and access to pharmaceuticals and a minimal staffing arrangement, is the starting point for ACS planning.
Palliative Care
In the event of an MCE, it will be assumed that some people may survive the onset of the disaster but will have sustained such serious illness or injury that they will live only for a relatively short period of time. In addition, there will be vulnerable individuals (e.g., the elderly, those sick in hospitals, nursing homes, the disabled, children) who may be negatively impacted by the resulting scarcity of resources. In some instances, decisions will need to be made to withdraw resources from those not likely to survive and shunt those resources to others.
The goal of an organized and coordinated response to an MCE should be to maximize the number of lives saved. At the same time, there should be a goal to provide the greatest comfort and minimize the psychological suffering of those whose lives may be shortened as a result of an MCE. These issues fall under the broad rubric of palliative care, which refers to the aggressive management of symptoms and relief of suffering.
The overarching issue of how to provide optimal support for the dying, those facing life-limiting illness or injury, and those caring for them must be integrated into initial planning efforts as well as addressed throughout the response to an MCE, as discussed in Chapter VII.
Case Study: Influenza Pandemic
The concepts, strategies, and approaches that planners need to consider in the context of an MCE highlighted in the chapters of the planning guide are applied to a specific case study scenario. The case study selected involves a potential influenza pandemic. The key issues that planners need to consider when faced with the challenges of allocating scarce resources in the context of a pandemic are presented in Chapter VIII.
MCE Advance Planning Themes and Recommendations
In the event of a catastrophic MCE, community planners will face the challenge of allocating scarce resources in a timely enough fashion to prevent undue illness and death. As the chapters of this guide indicate, in order to prepare for such an eventuality, planners need to focus on the following:
CONSIDER THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES RELATED TO PLANNING AND RESPONDING TO AN MCE.
Planners must be familiar with State emergency powers and have a solid understanding of what types of events or circumstances would trigger their implementation. Planners also must be familiar with the ethical principles that underlie decision making for the allocation of scarce resources.
INTEGRATE PALLIATIVE CARE STRATEGIES ACROSS THE PLANNING PROCESS.
Plans should be made for how to care for individuals who are not expected to survive the MCE and how to support the family members and others who are caring for them.
Clearly, the optimal allocation of scarce resources in response to an MCE is unlikely to occur without proper advance planning at the health care facility, community, State, and Federal levels. Simply put, the goal of this planning guide is to promote and assist in those efforts.
End of Preview.
RETURN to Main Titles Index or
Anti-Terror, Terrorism & Terrorists
Please Read The Website Disclaimer!
Copyright 1986-2012, The Survival & Self-Reliance Studies Institute (SSRsi), All
Rights Reserved
Site conceptualized, designed, created & maintained by MEG Raven
Snail Mail: SSRsi, PO Box 2572 Dillon, CO. 80435-2572