~ Another Right-wing Conservative Libertarian Rant ~

Iraq, The USA & The World
by MEG Raven


Intuition  ~  Creativity  ~  Adaptability
Home Page
Table of Contents
Emergencies
Family Affairs
Natural Disasters
New World Order
Outdoor Survival
Self-Reliance
Shortages
TEOTWAWKI
Terrorism & Terrorists
United States Government
War & Military
Other Stuff


Contact SSRsi
News, Ads and Chat
Support SSRsi
Reciprocal Links


SSRsi OnLine Store
Get Firefox!

Let Us Know!

Iraq, The USA & The World

While I am naturally inclined to doubt pretty much any established government and, having served in the US Army as a combat medic (3/87th Infantry), have an equal distaste for military action on foreign soil - I really don't see what all the great debate is about. The situation in Iraq needs to be resolved. It needs to be resolved now - before the madman who controls that country through fear and force has the chance to do something (else) seriously stupid.

All these countries that want to "give the inspectors more time" are really saying, "we don't like or trust the American government's motives." Screw them. We don't need them and, in my humble opinion, we should simply shrug our shoulder's and let them KNOW that we neither desire nor require their faith or admiration. And then cease, immediately, all US aid - in any and every form - to those countries. Pull our bases out (effectively ending the support for those local economies which rely on US servicemen spending their pay there), cancel all leases of land, close all but one embassy in the Capital city, and stop sending food, information, and monetary supports or guarantees to that nation.

Let's see how well Canada, France, Germany and Russia do without the BILLIONS of dollars and materiel we supply them each year, in one form or another.

What are these people worried about? That we are going to occupy Iraq and keep all the oil and sand for ourselves? There is absolutely no sense to that argument - nor any historical precedent. The United States Military has "liberated" France, Germany, Japan - and all those countries initially invaded and overcome by Germany & Japan - and there is not a single one of these countries that has not BENEFITED from this action. Do we control any of these countries? Do we keep their resources for ourselves? Are their people held under our thumb? Are their leaders and governments "puppets" of the US Government?

Our men and women died for THEIR freedom. OUR economy, OUR engineers, and OUR technology rebuilt their ravaged infrastructures - and made them better today than they had ever been before. There is not a single country in the world that has been "invaded" and had their repressive governments overthrown by US forces that has not benefited immeasurably by our action.

So why are all these people screaming? What motive do they have for hating us so much? Why are they willing to let the Iraqi people suffer under Saddam Hussein's regime?

I think (aside from the legitimate concern of mothers and fathers of US military servicemen and women who will be risking their lives) it's all a matter of jealousy. Political grandstanding and petty jealousy. And possibly a smidgen of misdirected outrage at their own lack of ability to do the right thing themselves. They have all been invited to join us.

In our country there are those who protest against our servicemen and women, by protesting the coming Iraq action. That is their right, but I wonder how many of them actually have anything at stake? I doubt there are very many military families out there protesting. So their main motive is political - a hatred for Republicans, a hatred for the military, a hatred for George Bush, or a hatred for governments in general. All petty arguments when we look at the facts concerning Iraq, Saddam Hussein, and the Iraqi peoples:

Sanctions were imposed on Iraq by the international community in the wake of Iraq's brutal invasion of Kuwait. They are intended to prevent the Iraqi regime access to resources that it would use to reconstitute weapons of mass destruction. Sanctions are not intended to harm the people of Iraq. That is why the sanctions regime has always specifically exempted food and medicine. The Iraqi regime has always been free to import as much of these goods as possible. It refuses to do so, even though it claims it wants to relieve the suffering of the people of Iraq.

Iraq is actually exporting food, even though it says its people are malnourished. Coalition ships enforcing the UN sanctions against Iraq recently diverted the ship M/V MINIMARE containing 2,000 metric tons of rice and other material being exported from Iraq for hard currency instead of being used to support the Iraqi people. Baby milk sold to Iraq through the oil-for-food program has been found in markets throughout the Gulf, demonstrating that the Iraqi regime is depriving its people of much-needed goods in order to make an illicit profit. Kuwaiti authorities recently seized a shipment coming out of Iraq carrying, among other items, baby powder, baby bottles, and other nursing materials for resale overseas (see photo 1).

Sanctions prevent Saddam from spending money on rearmament, but do not stop him from spending money on food and medicine for Iraqis. Saddam's priorities are clear: palaces for himself, prisons for his people, and weapons to destroy Iraq's citizens and its neighbors. He has built 48 palaces for himself since the Gulf War! He would not use Iraq's resources to improve the lives of Iraqis. Saddam Hussein would use them to rearm and threaten the region.

While its repression of the Iraqi people continues, the Iraqi regime still is far from complying with its obligations under United Nations Security Council resolutions. It has not fully complied with a single resolution. It has not fully declared and destroyed its WMD programs. It has not ceased concealment of its WMD. It has not responded fully to questions from UNSCOM and the IAEA. (UNSCRs 687, 707, 715, 1051)

It has not returned Kuwaiti and Third Country POWs and Missing Persons (UNSCRs 686 and 687). 605 Kuwaiti POW/MIAs and 34 Saudis remain unaccounted for. It has not returned all stolen Kuwaiti property (UNSCR 686). In fact, some is still deployed with Iraqi military units. It has not stopped repressing its civilian population (UNSCR 688). UNSCR 687 and related resolutions 707, 715, and 1051 stipulate that:

- Iraq must provide full, final and complete disclosure of all aspects of its nuclear, chemical, biological, and long-range missile weapons programs;

- allow unconditional inspection access by international monitors;

- cease any attempt to conceal, move, or destroy any material or equipment related to these programs;

- and cooperate with UN monitoring of relevant Iraqi facilities and trade activities.

When these resolutions were passed, it was expected that compliance would require no more than 90 days. Instead, nine years later, sanctions remain in place because Iraq has decided to (1) hide weapons and major components of these programs, (2) secretly destroy older, less-capable weapons and equipment, and (3) give UN inspectors fraudulent declarations to mask weapons and equipment that are still hidden.

Iraq began playing hide-and-seek with UN inspectors in 1991. In 1995, Iraqis who conducted field trials of R-400 bombs filled with biological agents described the tests to UNSCOM experts in considerable detail, including the use of many animals. These field trials were reflected in Iraq's June 1996 biological weapons declaration. Yet, amazingly, Iraq now denies that any such trials were conducted at all!

In September 1995, Iraq finally declared the existence of two projects to disseminate biological agents from Mirage F-1 and MiG-21 aircraft, yet there is no evidence that the prototype weapons and aircraft were ever destroyed. There is also no evidence that the 12 Iraqi helicopter-borne aerosol generators for biological weapon delivery were ever destroyed.

In July 1998, Iraq seized from the hands of UNSCOM inspectors an Iraqi Air Force document indicating that Iraq had misrepresented the expenditure of over 6,000 bombs which may have contained over 700 tons of chemical agent. Iraq continues to refuse to provide this document to the UN.

In December 1998, Saddam stopped all cooperation with the UN, refusing to let any weapons inspectors into the country.

Iraq continues to deny weaponizing VX nerve agent, despite the fact that UNSCOM found VX nerve agent residues on Iraqi SCUD missile warhead fragments. Based on its investigations, international experts concluded that "Iraq has the know-how and process equipment, and may possess precursors to manufacture as much as 200 tons of VX ... The retention of a VX capability by Iraq cannot be excluded by the UNSCOM international expert team."

Iraq has refused to credibly account for 500 tons of SCUD propellant, over 40 SCUD biological and conventional warheads, 7 Iraqi-produced SCUDs, and truckloads of SCUD components.

Iraq refuses to allow inspection of thousands of Ministry of Defense and Military Industries Commission documents relating to biological and chemical weapons and long-range missiles.

Saddam Hussein seized power in 1979. The list of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by Saddam Hussein and his regime is a long one. The use of poison gas and other war crimes against Iran and the Iranian people during the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war. Iraq summarily executed thousands of Iranian prisoners of war as a matter of policy. The "Anfal" campaign in the late 1980's against the Iraqi Kurds, including the use of poison gas on cities. In one of the worst single mass killings in recent history, Iraq dropped chemical weapons on Halabja in 1988, in which as many as 5,000 people — mostly civilians — were killed. Crimes against humanity and possibly genocide against Iraqi Kurds in northern Iraq. This includes the destruction of over 3,000 villages. The Iraqi government's campaign of forced deportations of Kurdish and Turkomen families to southern Iraq has created approximately 900,000 internally displaced citizens throughout the country. Crimes against humanity and possibly genocide against Marsh Arabs and Shi'a Arabs in southern Iraq. Entire populations of villages have been forcibly expelled. Government forces have burned their houses and fields, demolished houses with bulldozers, and undertaken a deliberate campaign to drain and poison the marshes. Thousands of civilians have been summarily executed.

Saddam Hussein is bad for Iraq and bad for the world. Why does anyone believe he should be given any more chances to behave and how could anyone believe that he could or would change his spots?

Why is the world demonizing the United States instead of Saddam Hussein? Do you realize that the United States budget for 2003 foreign aid, world wide, is over 8 Billion dollars? How about we tell the world to piss-off and use the cash ourselves? Yeah - spend the money on OUR schools, hospitals and roads, a new source of energy, food production and drought/flood protection. If the rest of the world hates us so much, let's take our ball and go home. Let's give them what they want - and let them swallow that little pill for a few years. Who knows? They might be better off.

 

'nuff said.

MEG
27 January 2003

 

 

Please Read The Website Disclaimer!
Copyright 1986-2009, The Survival & Self-Reliance Studies Institute (SSRsi), All Rights Reserved
Site conceptualized, designed, created & maintained by MEG Raven
Snail Mail: SSRsi, PO Box 2572 Dillon, CO. 80435-2572